top of page
Search

Forced Entry vs Ballistic Protection What Is the Difference and Why It Matters

  • Joseph Hayes
  • 19 hours ago
  • 4 min read

When people talk about “security glass,” they often assume it all does the same thing.


It doesn’t.


There is a major difference between materials designed to stop a smash and grab attack and materials engineered to stop a bullet. If you choose the wrong one, you are not protected—you are just delayed.

What is the difference between forced entry and ballistic protection


Forced entry protection is designed to resist physical attacks such as hammers, crowbars, and repeated impact in order to delay intrusion.


Ballistic protection is engineered to stop bullets using materials tested under UL 752 standards to prevent penetration.


If it is not tested to stop a bullet, it will not stop a bullet.


Forced Entry vs Ballistic Protection Comparison

Feature

Forced Entry

Ballistic Protection

Threat Type

Physical attack

Firearms

Goal

Delay entry

Stop penetration

Testing

ASTM impact testing

UL 752 ballistic testing

Materials

Laminated glass, security film

Polycarbonate, glass clad systems, composites

Outcome

May eventually fail

Designed to stop bullets

What Is Forced Entry Protection


Forced entry systems are designed to slow someone down.

They are commonly used in retail environments where the main threat is theft. The goal is to make it harder and more time consuming for someone to break through a window or door.



Typical threats include

  • Hammers

  • Crowbars

  • Bricks

  • Repeated blunt force


How it works


These systems rely on:

  • Laminated glass

  • Security interlayers

  • Surface applied films


They hold together after impact, but they are not designed to stop high energy ballistic threats.


Given enough time and force, forced entry systems can fail.


What Is Ballistic Protection

Ballistic protection is built for one purpose—stop the threat.

This is not about slowing someone down. This is about preventing a bullet from entering the protected space.


How it works


Ballistic systems use:

  • Polycarbonate laminates

  • Glass clad polycarbonate

  • Advanced materials such as UHMWPE (LytArmor)


These materials absorb and disperse energy, preventing penetration.


How it is tested


Ballistic products are tested under UL 752, which defines protection levels based on:

  • Caliber

  • Velocity

  • Number of shots


Examples:

  • Level 1 through Level 3 address handgun threats

  • Higher levels address rifle threats and repeated impacts


If it passes, the bullet does not go through. That is the difference.

The Biggest Misconception in the Industry


One of the most dangerous assumptions we see is this:


If it is hard to break, it must stop a bullet.


That is completely false.


Forced entry glass may resist impact, but it is not engineered to handle ballistic energy. In many cases, it will fail quickly under firearm testing.


On the other hand, true ballistic systems often provide strong forced entry resistance as a secondary benefit.


But the reverse is not true.

Component Testing vs System Testing


This is where most people get misled.


Many products on the market are tested as individual components, not as full systems.


That means:

  • The glass may be tested

  • But the frame is not

  • The anchoring is not

  • The full assembly is not

A real ballistic system includes:

  • Framing

  • Glazing

  • Anchoring

All tested together under live fire conditions.


If the system is not tested as a whole, it is not proven protection.

Where Each System Should Be Used


Forced entry protection is best for

  • Retail storefronts

  • Shopping centers

  • Low risk commercial buildings

  • Theft deterrence


Ballistic protection is critical for

  • Schools

  • Government buildings

  • Police stations

  • Financial institutions

  • High risk facilities

Why This Matters More Than Ever


Threats today are different. Expectations for safety are higher. The margin for error is zero.

If your goal is to slow someone down, forced entry systems may be enough.


If your goal is to protect lives, there is only one option:


Ballistic protection that has been physically tested.


Anything else is a compromise.



Frequently Asked Questions


What is the difference between forced entry glass and ballistic glass?

Forced entry glass is designed to delay physical break ins from tools like hammers, crowbars, bricks, and repeated blunt force. Ballistic glass is engineered and tested to stop bullets from penetrating the protected space.


Does forced entry glass stop bullets?

No. Forced entry glass is not designed to stop bullets unless it has also been specifically tested and rated for ballistic protection under a standard such as UL 752.


What does UL 752 mean?

UL 752 is a bullet resistant standard that tests materials and systems against specific firearm threats, calibers, velocities, and shot patterns.


Can security film make glass bulletproof?

No. Security film can help hold glass together after impact, but it does not turn standard glass into bullet resistant glass.


Is ballistic glass also forced entry resistant?

In many cases, ballistic glazing can provide strong forced entry resistance as a secondary benefit, but the system should still be reviewed based on the exact threat and test requirements.


Why does full system testing matter?

A bullet resistant opening is more than just the glass. The frame, glazing, anchoring, and hardware must work together. If only the glass is tested, the full opening may not provide proven protection.




 
 
 

Comments


© 2025 by Action Bullet Resistant, Inc. 

  • instagram
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
bottom of page